Traktat ze Spiry: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

Z Felczak story
Przejdź do nawigacji Przejdź do wyszukiwania
(Utworzono nową stronę "Kategoria:2 Kategoria:Strony przetłumaczone z angielskiej Wikipedii {{Uwaga| |strona = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Speyer_(1570) |autorzy = https:/...")
 
Linia 29: Linia 29:
 
John Sigismund became ''princeps Transsylvaniae et partium regni Hungariae dominus''&nbsp;– Prince of Transylvania and of [[Partium|a part of the Kingdom of Hungary]].<ref name="Keul">István Keul, [https://books.google.com/books?id=5J09mqMWiogC&pg=PA40 ''Early modern religious communities in East-Central Europe: ethnic diversity, denominational plurality, and corporative politics in the principality of Transylvania (1526–1691)''], BRILL, 2009, p. 61</ref> According to the treaty, the [[Principality of Transylvania (1570–1711)|Principality of Transylvania]] continued to be part of the [[Kingdom of Hungary]] in the sense of public law.<ref>Anthony Endrey, [https://books.google.com/books?id=ewYiAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA70 ''The Holy Crown of Hungary''], Hungarian Institute, 1978, p. 70</ref>
 
John Sigismund became ''princeps Transsylvaniae et partium regni Hungariae dominus''&nbsp;– Prince of Transylvania and of [[Partium|a part of the Kingdom of Hungary]].<ref name="Keul">István Keul, [https://books.google.com/books?id=5J09mqMWiogC&pg=PA40 ''Early modern religious communities in East-Central Europe: ethnic diversity, denominational plurality, and corporative politics in the principality of Transylvania (1526–1691)''], BRILL, 2009, p. 61</ref> According to the treaty, the [[Principality of Transylvania (1570–1711)|Principality of Transylvania]] continued to be part of the [[Kingdom of Hungary]] in the sense of public law.<ref>Anthony Endrey, [https://books.google.com/books?id=ewYiAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA70 ''The Holy Crown of Hungary''], Hungarian Institute, 1978, p. 70</ref>
  
−
This treaty, like the earlier [[Treaty of Nagyvárad]], endorsed the principle of a united Hungary. Partium and Transylvania were entrusted to John Sigismund Zápolya, as a vassal of Maximilian. As mentioned above, the Zápolyas had already held the Partium, but now the Habsburgs recognized their lordship. In a sense, John Sigismund traded his royal title for territory.
+
This treaty, like the earlier [[Váradi béke|Układ w Wielkim Waradynie]], endorsed the principle of a united Hungary. Partium and Transylvania were entrusted to John Sigismund Zápolya, as a vassal of Maximilian. As mentioned above, the Zápolyas had already held the Partium, but now the Habsburgs recognized their lordship. In a sense, John Sigismund traded his royal title for territory.
  
 
{{Treaties of Hungary}}
 
{{Treaties of Hungary}}

Wersja z 15:32, 11 paź 2020

Strona Autorzy Nota
[1] [2] Ten artykuł został przetłumaczony z Wikipedii w języku angielskim. Treści pochodzące z Wikipedii w języku angielskim są oparte na licencji Creative Commons 3.0 – Uznanie Autorstwa – Na tych samych warunkach. Kopiując je lub tłumacząc, należy podać ich autorów i udostępnić na tych samych warunkach.

The Treaty of Speyer, signed at the Diet of Speyer in 1570, was a peace agreement between the two Hungarian Kingdoms, Royal Hungary led by Maximilian II, and the Eastern Hungarian Kingdom, ruled by John Sigismund Zápolya.


Transylvania before the Treaty of Speyer

Unlike the autonomous Kingdom of Croatia, medieval Transylvania was not a separate Land of the Holy Crown of Hungary, it was simply an administratively distinct[1], and an integral part[2][3] of the medieval Kingdom of Hungary.

Status of Transylvania after the treaty

John Sigismund abdicated as King of Hungary, however, Maximilian II recognized John Sigismund's authority as "Prince of Transylvania" and, in return, John Sigismund accepted Maximilian II as King of Hungary with suzerainty over his principality.[4]

Plik:Partium1570.PNG
John Sigismund's realm in 1570

John Sigismund became princeps Transsylvaniae et partium regni Hungariae dominus – Prince of Transylvania and of a part of the Kingdom of Hungary.[5] According to the treaty, the Principality of Transylvania continued to be part of the Kingdom of Hungary in the sense of public law.[6]

This treaty, like the earlier Układ w Wielkim Waradynie, endorsed the principle of a united Hungary. Partium and Transylvania were entrusted to John Sigismund Zápolya, as a vassal of Maximilian. As mentioned above, the Zápolyas had already held the Partium, but now the Habsburgs recognized their lordship. In a sense, John Sigismund traded his royal title for territory.

Szablon:Treaties of Hungary

References

  1. ↑ Carlile Aylmer Macartney (2008). Hungary: From Ninth Century Origins to the 1956 Uprising. Transaction Publishers. str. 23. ISBN 9780202366654. https://books.google.com/books?id=kjInqy_sxisC&pg=PA23&dq=%22Unlike+Croatia,+however,+Transylvania+was+not+a+separate+Land+of+the+Hungarian+Crown,+but+simply+an+administratively+distinct+part+of+the+kingdom+of+Hungary.%22&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22Unlike%20Croatia%2C%20however%2C%20Transylvania%20was%20not%20a%20separate%20Land%20of%20the%20Hungarian%20Crown%2C%20but%20simply%20an%20administratively%20distinct%20part%20of%20the%20kingdom%20of%20Hungary.%22&f=false. 
  2. ↑ Felicia Rosu (2017). Elective Monarchy in Transylvania and Poland-Lithuania, 1569-1587. Oxford University Press. str. 24. ISBN 9780192506436. https://books.google.com/books?dq=transylvania+%22integral+part%22&hl=en&id=Y_pADwAAQBAJ&pg=PA24&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=transylvania%20%22integral%20part%22&f=false. 
  3. ↑ Rogers Brubaker; Margit Feischmidt; Jon Fox; Liana Grancea (2018). Nationalist Politics and Everyday Ethnicity in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton University Press. str. 57. ISBN 9780880334792. https://books.google.com/books?id=n_1ZDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA63&lpg=PA63&dq=transylvania+%22integral+part%22&source=bl&ots=XoGMkPvfb0&sig=ACfU3U2FtJtvoX5yrFfOxyi3jeMic90dPQ&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=transylvania%20%22integral%20part%22&f=false. 
  4. ↑ Andrew Pettegree, The Reformation World, Routledge, 2000, p. 192
  5. ↑ István Keul, Early modern religious communities in East-Central Europe: ethnic diversity, denominational plurality, and corporative politics in the principality of Transylvania (1526–1691), BRILL, 2009, p. 61
  6. ↑ Anthony Endrey, The Holy Crown of Hungary, Hungarian Institute, 1978, p. 70
{{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters|check|unknown=|preview=Page using Template:Reflist with unknown parameter "_VALUE_"|ignoreblank=y| 1 | colwidth | group | liststyle | refs }}
Źródło: „http://natusiewicz.pl/felczak/index.php?title=Traktat_ze_Spiry&oldid=44812”