Felvidék

Z Felczak story
Przejdź do nawigacji Przejdź do wyszukiwania
Plik:Cassovia 1617.jpg
"Cassovia: Superioris Hungariae Civitas Primaria",[1] the prospect from Civitates orbis terrarum. Cassovia (Slovak: Košice, German: Kaschau, Hungarian: Kassa), the "capital" of Upper Hungary in 1617.

Górne Węgry to zwykłe angielskie tłumaczenie Felvidéka (lit .: „Upland”), węgierskiego terminu oznaczającego obszar, który był historycznie północną częścią Królestwa Węgier, obecnie głównie dzisiejszą Słowacją. [2] [3] [ 4] [5] Region został również nazwany Felső-Magyarország (lit: „Upper Hungary”, słowacki: Horné Uhorsko).

Upper Hungary is the usual English translation of Felvidék (lit.: "Upland"), the Hungarian term for the area that was historically the northern part of the Kingdom of Hungary, now mostly present-day Slovakia.[2][3][4][5] The region has also been called Felső-Magyarország (lit: "Upper Hungary", ). 

Podczas wojen habsbursko-osmańskich Górne Węgry oznaczały tylko północno-wschodnie części Królestwa Węgier. Regiony północno-zachodnie (dzisiejsza zachodnia i środkowa Słowacja) należały do ​​Dolnych Węgier. Jakiś czas w XVIII lub XIX wieku Górne Węgry zaczęły implikować całe północne regiony królestwa. Ludność Górnych Węgier była mieszana i składała się głównie ze Słowaków, Węgrów, Niemców i Rusinów. Pierwsze złożone dane demograficzne pochodzą z XVIII wieku, w którym Słowacy stanowili większość ludności Górnych Węgier [6]. Słowacy nazwali to terytorium „Słowacką” (Słowacja), który to termin pojawia się w dokumentach pisemnych z XV wieku, ale nie został precyzyjnie zdefiniowany [7], a region zamieszkały przez Słowaków nie posiadał wyraźnego statusu prawnego, konstytucyjnego ani politycznego na Górnych Węgrzech [8]

During the Habsburg–Ottoman wars, Upper Hungary meant only the northeastern parts of the Hungarian Kingdom. The northwestern regions (present-day western and central Slovakia) belonged to Lower Hungary. Sometime during the 18th or 19th centuries, Upper Hungary began to imply the whole northern regions of the kingdom.  
The population of Upper Hungary was mixed and mainly consisted of Slovaks, Hungarians, Germans and Ruthenians. The first complex demographic data are from the 18th century, in which Slovaks constituted the majority population in Upper Hungary.[6] Slovaks called this territory "Slovensko" (Slovakia), which term appears in written documents from the 15th century, but it was not precisely defined[7] and the region inhabited by Slovaks held no distinct legal, constitutional, or political status within Upper Hungary.[8] 

Etymology

Historical usage

Historically there are different meanings: 
1. The older Hungarian term Felső-Magyarország (literally: "Upper Hungary"; ; ; Szablon:Lang-uk; Szablon:Lang-ru) formally referred to what is today Slovakia in the 16th-18th centuries and informally to all the northern parts of the Kingdom of Hungary in the 19th century. 
2. There are some 16th-century sources which refer to the Slovak-inhabited territory of the Kingdom of Hungary as "Sclavonia" or "Slováky", names that distinguish the region ethnically as well as geographically.[9] 
3. The Hungarian Felvidék (literally: "Upper Country", "Upland", "Highland," or perhaps more accurately "Upper Landscape" or "Upper Countryside"; ;  ; Szablon:Lang-yi) has had several informal meanings: 
  • In the 19th century and part of the 18th, it was usually used:
    • to denote the mountainous northern part of the Kingdom of Hungary as opposed to the southern lowlands
    • more generally, to denote regions or territories situated at a higher altitude than the settlement of the speaker
    • as a synonym for the then-meaning of Felső-Magyarország
  • After World War I, the meaning in the Hungarian language was restricted to Slovakia and Carpathian Ruthenia, and after World War II to Slovakia only. At the same time, the word felvidék remains a common Hungarian noun applied to areas at higher elevations, e.g., Balaton-felvidék,[10] a hilly region and national park[11] adjacent to Lake Balaton.


Modern usage

After World War I, the meaning of Felvidék in the Hungarian language (Felső-Magyarország was not used anymore) was restricted to the Slovakian and Carpathian Ruthenian parts of Czechoslovakia. Today the term Felvidék is sometimes used in Hungary when speaking about Slovakia, and it is exclusively (and anachronistically) used in Hungarian historical literature when speaking about the Middle Ages, i.e., before the name actually came into existence. The three counties of the region that remained in Hungary after World War I, however, are never called Upper Hungary today, only Northern Hungary (Észak-Magyarország). Any use of the word Felvidék to denote all of modern Slovakia is considered offensive by Slovaks,[12] and inappropriate by some Hungarians,[13] but it is now commonly used by the sizeable Hungarian minority in the southern border-zone of Slovakia[14] to identify the Hungarian-majority areas where they live.[15][16] Some of them call themselves felvidéki magyarok, i.e. the "Upland Hungarians."  The word felvidék is also used as a component of the toponym Balaton-felvidék, describing the hilly area north of Lake Balaton, with no connection to the historical Upper Hungary.[17] 

History

Plik:Central europe 1572.png
Captaincy of Upper Hungary in 1572.

Middle Ages

The term Upper Hungary often occurs in publications on history as a somewhat-anachronistic translation of other, earlier (then Latin) designations denoting approximately the same territory. Some of the other terms were Partes Danubii septentrionales (Territories to the north of the Danube) or Partes regni superiores (Upper parts of the Kingdom). The actual name "Upper Hungary" arose later from the latter phrase. 
In the 15th century, the "Somorja (Šamorín), Nagyszombat (Trnava), Galgóc (Hlohovec), Nyitra  (Nitra), Léva (Levice), Losonc (Lučenec), Rimaszombat (Rimavská Sobota), Rozsnyó (Rožňava), Jászó (Jasov), Kassa (Košice), Gálszécs (Sečovce), Nagymihály (Michalovce)" line was the northern "boundary" of the Hungarian ethnic area.[18] 

Affiliation to Hungary

The Principality of Nitra emerged in the 8th century and developed into an independent Slavic state; although the polity may have lost its independence when it was still at the stage of development.[19][20] In the early 9th century, the polity was situated on the north-western territories of present-day Slovakia. 

16th - 17th centuries

The term emerged approximately after the conquest of today's Hungary by the Ottomans in the 16th century when Felső-Magyarország (German: Oberungarn; Slovak: Horné Uhorsko) referred to present-day eastern Slovakia and the adjacent territories of today's Hungary and Ukraine that were not occupied by the Ottoman Empire. That territory formed a separate military district (the "Captaincy of Upper Hungary" (1564–1686) headquartered in Kassa/Kaschau/Košice) within Royal Hungary. At that time, present-day western Slovakia, and sometimes also the remaining territories of Royal Hungary to the south of it, were called Lower Hungary (Hungarian: Alsó-Magyarország; German: Niederungarn; Slovak: Dolné Uhorsko). 
It was briefly a separate vassal state of the Ottoman Empire under Imre Thököly in the 1680s. 
This usage occurs in many texts up to around 1800 – for example, the renowned mining school of Schemnitz/Selmecbánya/Banská Štiavnica in present-day central Slovakia was founded in "Lower" Hungary (not in "Upper" Hungary) in the 18th century and Pozsony (today's Bratislava) was also referred to as being in "Lower" Hungary in the late 18th century. 

Zobacz także

Przypisy

  1. Kniha (Matica slovenská) Szablon:ISSN, 2008: p. 16.
  2. Gardiner, Duncan (1991). German Towns in Slovakia and Upper Hungary: A Genealogical Gazetteer. ISBN 978-0-929871-02-8. http://feefhs.org/links/Slovakia/dg-gps.html. 
  3. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
  4. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
  5. Demarée, G.R.; Ogilvie, A.E.J. (2001). [[[:Szablon:Google books]] "Bons Baisers d'Islande: Climatic, Environmental, and Human Dimensions Impacts of the Lakagígar Eruption (1783-1784) in Iceland"]. u: Jones, Philip D. History and Climate: Memories of the Future?. Kluwer Academic Publishers. str. 234. ISBN 0306465892. Szablon:Google books. 
  6. Kocsis, Károly; Kocsisné Hodosi, Eszter (1998). [[[:Szablon:Google books]] Ethnic Geography of the Hungarian Minorities in the Carpathian Basin]. Budapest: Geographical Research Institute Research Centre for Earth Sciences. str. 41. ISBN 9637395849. Szablon:Google books. 
  7. Kováč, Dušan (2011). [[[:Szablon:Google books]] "Slovakia, the Slovaks and their history"]. u: Teich, Mikuláš; Kováč, Dušan. Slovakia in history. Cambridge University Press. str. 3. ISBN 0521802539. Szablon:Google books. 
  8. Felak, James Ramon (1994). [[[:Szablon:Google books]] At the Price of the Republic: Hlinka's Slovak People's Party, 1929–1938]. University of Pittsburgh Press. str. 3–. ISBN 978-0-8229-3779-1. Szablon:Google books. 
  9. Balaton-felvidéki Nemzeti Park
  10. Balaton Uplands National Park
  11. E.g., Szablon:Cite news.
  12. Käfer, István (2002). "Terminologia Hungaro-Sclavonica: a magyar-szlovák interetnikus összefüggések történeti vizsgálatának terminológiai kérdései". u: Rozsondai, Marianne (hu). Jubileumi csokor Csapodi Csaba tiszteletére: Tanulmányok. Budapest: Argumentum. ISBN 9634462065. .
  13. Lanstyák, István; Simon, Szabolcs, ur. (1998) (hu). Tanulmányok a magyar–szlovák kétnyelvűségről. Bratislava: Kalligram. ISBN 80-7149-193-4. .
  14. Liszka, József (2014). "Felvidék". u: Urbán, Zsolt (hu). A (cseh)szlovákiai magyarok lexikona — Csehszlovákia megalakulásától napjainkig. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo – Mladé letá. ISBN 978-80-10-00399-0. 
  15. See, e.g., the systematic differentiated use of the words Felvidék and Szlovákia in the Hungarian-language newspaper Új Szó published by the Hungarians in Slovakia.
  16. Budai, Tamás i dr.. (1999) (hu). A Balaton-felvidék földtana : magyarázó a Balaton-felvidék földtani térképéhez (1:50 000). Budapest: Geological and Geophysical Institute of Hungary (MÁFI). ISBN 9636712247. .
  17. Szablon:Cite news
  18. {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}